Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion to modify his sentence. He argues that he was sentenced based on inaccurate information. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45432 - 2014-09-15
motion to modify his sentence. He argues that he was sentenced based on inaccurate information. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45432 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert C. Beese
CURIAM. Robert Beese appeals an order denying his motion for a reduced sentence. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2948 - 2005-03-31
CURIAM. Robert Beese appeals an order denying his motion for a reduced sentence. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2948 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Christopher D. Smith, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to vacate a DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64047 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. Christopher D. Smith, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to vacate a DNA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64047 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Kathryn P. Karlsson
, Respondent. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2001 WI 126 Reported at: 248 Wis. 2d 681, 635 N.W.2d 771
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16410 - 2017-09-21
, Respondent. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 2001 WI 126 Reported at: 248 Wis. 2d 681, 635 N.W.2d 771
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16410 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues: (1) that he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72992 - 2011-10-31
the circuit court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He argues: (1) that he should have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72992 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Messer and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Because we conclude the court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49632 - 2010-05-03
Messer and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Because we conclude the court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49632 - 2010-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that an issue with arguable merit has been located and a WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206857 - 2018-01-08
that an issue with arguable merit has been located and a WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206857 - 2018-01-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
against Christine Messer and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49632 - 2014-09-15
against Christine Messer and an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49632 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157543 - 2017-09-21
motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157543 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick Sandles
PER CURIAM. Derrick Sandles appeals from an order denying his sentence modification motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2006-02-06
PER CURIAM. Derrick Sandles appeals from an order denying his sentence modification motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2006-02-06