Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 57708 for id.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 57708 for id.
[PDF]
Mary L. Brice v. Roger Garfield Dale Miller, Sr.
to the facts that are properly found. See id. at 66, 306 N.W.2d at 20-21. It is well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14587 - 2017-09-21
to the facts that are properly found. See id. at 66, 306 N.W.2d at 20-21. It is well-established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald Savinski
the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To satisfy the prejudice prong, Savinski must demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12522 - 2017-09-21
the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To satisfy the prejudice prong, Savinski must demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12522 - 2017-09-21
State v. James Ward
by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
by a showing that the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Roger L. Stank
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
erroneous standard, while the ultimate question of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. at ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4442 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be “clear, deliberate, and unequivocal.” See id. at 174. In other words, a judicial admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75243 - 2014-09-15
be “clear, deliberate, and unequivocal.” See id. at 174. In other words, a judicial admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75243 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will serve as more than a discovery device.” Id. Thus, a defendant is not entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
will serve as more than a discovery device.” Id. Thus, a defendant is not entitled to an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a fact or set of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law. Id. If the circuit court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699296 - 2023-09-06
a fact or set of facts is a “new factor” is a question of law. Id. If the circuit court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699296 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
advanced.” Id. The mere fact that the government did not completely prevail at a contested case hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763167 - 2024-02-13
advanced.” Id. The mere fact that the government did not completely prevail at a contested case hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763167 - 2024-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
this issue in his no-merit response. The State is correct. His claim is barred. See id. ¶11 Next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
this issue in his no-merit response. The State is correct. His claim is barred. See id. ¶11 Next
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143085 - 2015-06-16
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
. Id. at 250, 249 N.W.2d at 288. The court suggested the following sentencing procedure: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4014 - 2017-09-20
. Id. at 250, 249 N.W.2d at 288. The court suggested the following sentencing procedure: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4014 - 2017-09-20