Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 25821 - 25830 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6439 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6300 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We disagree, and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6300 - 2017-09-19
Lillian P. v. Mely A.
is whether the trial court afforded them the necessary procedural protections in this guardianship proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15604 - 2005-03-31
is whether the trial court afforded them the necessary procedural protections in this guardianship proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15604 - 2005-03-31
Anthony Pratt v. Frank M. Cappozzo
. Pratt claims the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint because the defect in the summons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9403 - 2005-03-31
. Pratt claims the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint because the defect in the summons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9403 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Kruse
on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting evidence that Kruse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7207 - 2005-03-31
on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by admitting evidence that Kruse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7207 - 2005-03-31
State v. Delmar McNeal
. The issue is whether the trial court clearly erred by finding clear and convincing evidence that McNeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9385 - 2005-03-31
. The issue is whether the trial court clearly erred by finding clear and convincing evidence that McNeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9385 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s order denying Grant’s demand for a trial to the court and effectively dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197398 - 2017-10-05
the circuit court’s order denying Grant’s demand for a trial to the court and effectively dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197398 - 2017-10-05
Peter Galowski v. Stephen Puckett
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6300 - 2005-03-31
also contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion for costs as the prevailing party. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6300 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Neuman
plea agreement, stipulated to in writing and presented to the trial court on the record, provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2153 - 2017-09-19
plea agreement, stipulated to in writing and presented to the trial court on the record, provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2153 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert Wilson
. He argues that the trial court should have given him eighty-nine days’ credit for pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31
. He argues that the trial court should have given him eighty-nine days’ credit for pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31