Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25831 - 25840 of 57708 for id.
Search results 25831 - 25840 of 57708 for id.
[PDF]
State v. Eugene F. Line
. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge detailing his reasons for selecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13964 - 2014-09-15
. Id. The court concluded that “a statement by the trial judge detailing his reasons for selecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13964 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 490. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74931 - 2014-09-15
statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. at 490. “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74931 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kelly L. McCray
and seizure satisfy constitutional demands. Id. Standing. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13046 - 2005-03-31
and seizure satisfy constitutional demands. Id. Standing. The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13046 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 57
. Id. ¶6 Brimer argues the statement he gave to his parole officer was compelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
. Id. ¶6 Brimer argues the statement he gave to his parole officer was compelled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48024 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
earlier is a question of law that we independently review. Id., ¶30. The question before us is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786480 - 2024-04-09
earlier is a question of law that we independently review. Id., ¶30. The question before us is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786480 - 2024-04-09
State v. Raul M. Cordova
). If the finding is one of constitutional fact, we will review it de novo. See id. Thus, we owe no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
). If the finding is one of constitutional fact, we will review it de novo. See id. Thus, we owe no deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of historical fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. We apply those facts to the applicable law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143838 - 2017-09-21
of historical fact are upheld unless clearly erroneous. Id. We apply those facts to the applicable law de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143838 - 2017-09-21
State v. Demetrius N.O.
is plain and unambiguous, we must disregard the title of a statute. See id. Because the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11908 - 2005-03-31
is plain and unambiguous, we must disregard the title of a statute. See id. Because the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11908 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid out because of the crime.” Id. (quotations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70213 - 2014-09-15
readily ascertainable pecuniary expenditure paid out because of the crime.” Id. (quotations omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70213 - 2014-09-15
State v. D. Ramee K. Fulani
issue, however, is “a judicial inquiry, not a medical determination.” Id., 2000 WI 101, ¶31, 237 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31
issue, however, is “a judicial inquiry, not a medical determination.” Id., 2000 WI 101, ¶31, 237 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31