Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25841 - 25850 of 68989 for he.

[PDF] Village of McFarland v. Dennis L. Preston
breath. At that time, Klementz asked Preston if he had been drinking. Preston admitted that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11275 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Patrick A. Saunders v. Gary McCaughtry
that Saunders made threatening comments on the phone and Saunders conceded to the committee that he “did say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13988 - 2014-09-15

State v. Joseph C. Evans
in conformity with a character trait, but to prove that the contact he had with the victim was for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12406 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David A. Braden
contained false information on prior sexual misconduct, some of which he claims was thirty-five- years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13820 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Thomas C. Owens
the man identified himself as a friend of her boyfriend, so she told him he could wait until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25529 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
offense. In 2012, his appellate counsel filed a no-merit report. Pantoja filed a response in which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102002 - 2013-09-17

State v. William T. Anderson
, the arresting officer testified that upon his arrival at the bar he asked the owner if she saw anything improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04

State v. Douglas E. Kaminski
five issues on appeal: (1) whether he was erroneously deprived of his full complement of peremptory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13986 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Bannen
for a period of three years and that he pay the costs of these proceedings. ¶2 We approve the stipulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16565 - 2005-03-31

Brown County v. Matthew W.G.
§ 51.20, Stats. He claims the trial court failed to consider that his primary need was treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15929 - 2005-03-31