Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25841 - 25850 of 57152 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 845. First, the court determines whether grounds exist to terminate the parent’s rights. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62968 - 2011-04-18

[PDF] NOTICE
related statutes, and we interpret it reasonably to avoid absurd or unreasonable results. Id., ¶46. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42805 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
is a legal standard, ordinarily one we review independently of the trial court. Id. Nonetheless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6738 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
could reach. See id. 2 See State v. Lomax, 146 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648226 - 2023-04-25

COURT OF APPEALS
by his lawyer that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” See id., 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121176 - 2014-09-08

State v. Willy J. Love
. See id., 466 U.S. at 687. If a defendant fails on either aspect—deficient performance or prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
to undermine confidence in the outcome. Id. ¶6 Although Jordan parades a litany of asserted errors, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42082 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. David L. Elliott
is procedural or remedial, and does not disturb contracts or vested rights. Id. We agree with Elliott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10196 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
or omissions by the lawyer that are “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id., 466
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49565 - 2010-05-03

[PDF] NOTICE
, and the evidence is relevant and will assist the trier of fact. Id. at 687-88. Cross-examination is the means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31097 - 2014-09-15