Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25841 - 25850 of 76665 for judgment for u s.
Search results 25841 - 25850 of 76665 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
In re the marriage of: Michael S. Eisenga, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Clare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
In re the marriage of: Michael S. Eisenga, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Clare
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
James McMahon v. St. Croix Falls School District
a judgment of the circuit court for Polk County: ROBERT H. RASMUSSEN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14409 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Polk County: ROBERT H. RASMUSSEN, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14409 - 2014-09-15
Julie L. Weber v. Angelene White
appeal.[2] Specifically, White had sought to pay the clerk of courts a portion of the judgment at issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16727 - 2005-03-31
appeal.[2] Specifically, White had sought to pay the clerk of courts a portion of the judgment at issue
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
“[a]s long as this issue is alive, until there is a final judgment entered from which no appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2455 - 2017-09-19
“[a]s long as this issue is alive, until there is a final judgment entered from which no appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
terminating D.J.A.’s parental rights are summarily affirmed. BACKGROUND D.J.A. and J.G. are the parents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194539 - 2017-09-21
terminating D.J.A.’s parental rights are summarily affirmed. BACKGROUND D.J.A. and J.G. are the parents
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194539 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
and that she should be appointed Mary K.M.’s guardian because she, as Mary K.M.’s mother, is best suited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26501 - 2017-09-21
and that she should be appointed Mary K.M.’s guardian because she, as Mary K.M.’s mother, is best suited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26501 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered evidence in the form of two affidavits from M.C. and M.C.’s son, K.L., recanting their original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338673 - 2021-02-23
discovered evidence in the form of two affidavits from M.C. and M.C.’s son, K.L., recanting their original
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338673 - 2021-02-23
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
in dismissing her petition and that she should be appointed Mary K.M.’s guardian because she, as Mary K.M.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26501 - 2006-09-18
in dismissing her petition and that she should be appointed Mary K.M.’s guardian because she, as Mary K.M.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26501 - 2006-09-18
Marjorie (Grimes) Mount v. Dennis Grimes
affirm. Marjorie Mount and Dennis Grimes were divorced by judgment entered April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8795 - 2005-03-31
affirm. Marjorie Mount and Dennis Grimes were divorced by judgment entered April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8795 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
authorizing D.R.D.’s involuntary commitment and requiring D.R.D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329473 - 2021-01-28
authorizing D.R.D.’s involuntary commitment and requiring D.R.D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329473 - 2021-01-28