Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25861 - 25870 of 57315 for id.
Search results 25861 - 25870 of 57315 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “However, the ultimate determination of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831867 - 2024-07-31
unless they are clearly erroneous.” Id. “However, the ultimate determination of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=831867 - 2024-07-31
State v. Rodney G. Zivcic
, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a “clear break” with the past.’” Id. at 694, 499 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13816 - 2005-03-31
, with no exception for cases in which the new rule constitutes a “clear break” with the past.’” Id. at 694, 499 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13816 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard Austin
cause. Id. at 36. Second, the trial court need not believe the officer’s account of the events, so long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31
cause. Id. at 36. Second, the trial court need not believe the officer’s account of the events, so long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the need for the search against the invasion the search entails.” Id. (citing Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100352 - 2013-08-05
the need for the search against the invasion the search entails.” Id. (citing Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100352 - 2013-08-05
[PDF]
State v. Rodney A. King
of evidence, are admissible if they are relevant. See id. at 788, 275 N.W.2d at 708. The trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15582 - 2017-09-21
of evidence, are admissible if they are relevant. See id. at 788, 275 N.W.2d at 708. The trial judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15582 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
functioning, we generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary rulings.” Id., ¶24 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149310 - 2017-09-21
functioning, we generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary rulings.” Id., ¶24 (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id. (citation omitted). Whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131640 - 2017-09-21
of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id. (citation omitted). Whether counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the application of estoppel. Id. Estoppel is not applied as freely against governmental agencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
the application of estoppel. Id. Estoppel is not applied as freely against governmental agencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12220 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
unreasonable[.]” Id. at 691. To prove prejudice, the defendant must show there is “a reasonable probability
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818675 - 2024-07-02
unreasonable[.]” Id. at 691. To prove prejudice, the defendant must show there is “a reasonable probability
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=818675 - 2024-07-02
Cynthia J. Danielson v. Steven G. Danielson
of the trial court. Id. Nonetheless, a determination that something is “substantial” requires the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6738 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court. Id. Nonetheless, a determination that something is “substantial” requires the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6738 - 2005-03-31