Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25871 - 25880 of 29810 for des.
Search results 25871 - 25880 of 29810 for des.
Lenticular Europe, LLC v. William T. Cunnally
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact and applying the hypothesis of innocence rule de novo to the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999685 - 2025-08-21
findings of fact and applying the hypothesis of innocence rule de novo to the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999685 - 2025-08-21
Frontsheet
, 116 Wis. 2d 380, 382, 342 N.W.2d 406 (1984). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133825 - 2015-01-27
, 116 Wis. 2d 380, 382, 342 N.W.2d 406 (1984). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133825 - 2015-01-27
State v. Thomas M. Stockland
is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis. 2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis. 2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
wi app 6 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP147 Complete Title of C...
statutes to undisputed facts, our review of the circuit court’s decision is de novo. Nelson v. McLaughlin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104991 - 2014-02-17
statutes to undisputed facts, our review of the circuit court’s decision is de novo. Nelson v. McLaughlin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104991 - 2014-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
on a lesser-included offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36035 - 2009-03-30
on a lesser-included offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36035 - 2009-03-30
State v. Bruce W. Ackerman
de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶29 The trial court determined that Leonard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶29 The trial court determined that Leonard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2650 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938335 - 2025-04-08
review of a motion for summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938335 - 2025-04-08
2010 WI APP 52
proffer. So, technically speaking, we would employ a de novo review of the document. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48519 - 2010-04-25
proffer. So, technically speaking, we would employ a de novo review of the document. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48519 - 2010-04-25
[PDF]
Robert P. Lunke v. Village of Bangor
. ¶22 Generally, we review summary judgments de novo employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15761 - 2017-09-21
. ¶22 Generally, we review summary judgments de novo employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15761 - 2017-09-21