Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25871 - 25880 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
Search results 25871 - 25880 of 59312 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
satisfied the criteria of the joinder statute, WIS. STAT. § 971.12. Therefore, we reject Reynoso’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
satisfied the criteria of the joinder statute, WIS. STAT. § 971.12. Therefore, we reject Reynoso’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992307 - 2025-08-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consider his WIS. STAT § 971.11(7) claim, the court denied all other relief. Shomo now appeals. Shomo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519156 - 2022-05-11
to consider his WIS. STAT § 971.11(7) claim, the court denied all other relief. Shomo now appeals. Shomo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=519156 - 2022-05-11
Alan Mains v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
legitimate doubt. Mains argues that a prehearing stipulation precluded LIRC from denying the claim based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9307 - 2005-03-31
legitimate doubt. Mains argues that a prehearing stipulation precluded LIRC from denying the claim based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9307 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the building. His explanation was also suspect because the incident he claimed to be upset about with the old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55649 - 2010-10-18
of the building. His explanation was also suspect because the incident he claimed to be upset about with the old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55649 - 2010-10-18
[PDF]
Washington County v. Richard E. Hupfer
to § 346.63(1)(b), STATS.1 Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11665 - 2017-09-19
to § 346.63(1)(b), STATS.1 Hupfer now appeals, claiming that the arresting officer lacked reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11665 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Girtler brought a postconviction motion raising his current claims. The circuit court denied Girtler’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592495 - 2022-11-22
, Girtler brought a postconviction motion raising his current claims. The circuit court denied Girtler’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592495 - 2022-11-22
State v. Craig L. Miller
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3344 - 2005-03-31
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3344 - 2005-03-31
State v. Craig L. Miller
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3347 - 2005-03-31
claims. Miller argues that his right to be free from double jeopardy was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
linked Huley’s conduct to the victim’s claimed damages. ¶9 In Madlock, the defendant pled no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102338 - 2017-09-21
linked Huley’s conduct to the victim’s claimed damages. ¶9 In Madlock, the defendant pled no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102338 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Phillip E. Holman
to eight years in prison. He claims he was denied due process when the trial court gave a misleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15458 - 2017-09-21
to eight years in prison. He claims he was denied due process when the trial court gave a misleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15458 - 2017-09-21