Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25871 - 25880 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 25871 - 25880 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and circuit court orders No. 2017AP2199-CR 2 denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227192 - 2018-11-15
and circuit court orders No. 2017AP2199-CR 2 denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227192 - 2018-11-15
Ingo Stange v. Jane Stange
judgment relating to maintenance, child support and property division. She contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2493 - 2005-03-31
judgment relating to maintenance, child support and property division. She contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also contends that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to seek suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01
also contends that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to seek suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
Susann M. Vander Wielen v. Ronald E. Van Asten
the trial court erred in determining that (1) the tenant was not a holdover, year-to-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19710 - 2017-09-21
the trial court erred in determining that (1) the tenant was not a holdover, year-to-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19710 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kevin Kirsch v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
of the named plaintiffs2 under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15762 - 2017-09-21
of the named plaintiffs2 under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15762 - 2017-09-21
Michael P. Rogers v. Cathy Rogers
three children.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3186 - 2005-03-31
three children.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - February 2012
to the court. At trial the plaintiffs testified to various complaints about the runway expansion’s effects
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77627 - 2014-09-15
to the court. At trial the plaintiffs testified to various complaints about the runway expansion’s effects
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77627 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Matthew T. Doughty
argues the trial court erred by (1) denying the motion to suppress his statements to police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6617 - 2017-09-19
argues the trial court erred by (1) denying the motion to suppress his statements to police officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6617 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael Wendt v. John H. Blazek
to maintain and use a pier at the water’s edge of the easement. 1 We affirm the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3007 - 2017-09-19
to maintain and use a pier at the water’s edge of the easement. 1 We affirm the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3007 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Penny P. Skaife
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant (OMVWI). The State claims the trial court erred in granting Skaife’s motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14981 - 2017-09-21