Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25881 - 25890 of 29984 for de.
Search results 25881 - 25890 of 29984 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Nowell v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263240 - 2020-06-04
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Nowell v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263240 - 2020-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’” unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. (quoted source omitted). I review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118622 - 2014-09-15
’” unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. (quoted source omitted). I review de novo whether those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118622 - 2014-09-15
Columbus Park Housing Corporation v. City of Kenosha
We review summary judgment determinations de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5034 - 2005-03-31
We review summary judgment determinations de novo, applying the same standards as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5034 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20923 - 2006-01-11
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20923 - 2006-01-11
[PDF]
de novo whether the circuit court applied the proper legal standard for reliability of expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310637 - 2020-12-03
de novo whether the circuit court applied the proper legal standard for reliability of expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=310637 - 2020-12-03
Karl A. Burg by his legal guardian v. Cincinnati Casualty Insurance Co.
. This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Peterson v. Midwest Security Ins. Co., 2001
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16450 - 2005-03-31
. This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Peterson v. Midwest Security Ins. Co., 2001
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16450 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph E. Adams
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts which we review de novo. See State v. Pheil, 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31
the application of constitutional principles to undisputed facts which we review de novo. See State v. Pheil, 152
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12710 - 2005-03-31
State v. James F. Karls
fact which we review de novo. See State v. Cummings, 199 Wis.2d 721, 748, 546 N.W.2d 406, 416 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
fact which we review de novo. See State v. Cummings, 199 Wis.2d 721, 748, 546 N.W.2d 406, 416 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. Davies
presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v. Sweat, 208 Wis. 2d 409, 414-15, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5737 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v. Sweat, 208 Wis. 2d 409, 414-15, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5737 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Geoffrey L. Bilda and Virginia Schumann v. County of Milwaukee
review the dismissal of an action on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24574 - 2017-09-21
review the dismissal of an action on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24574 - 2017-09-21