Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25881 - 25890 of 30191 for de.
Search results 25881 - 25890 of 30191 for de.
Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11968 - 2005-03-31
and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11968 - 2005-03-31
Debra L. Kontowicz v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin
interpretation of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6768 - 2005-03-31
interpretation of a statute is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6768 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at the relevant time is a legal question we review de novo. See State v. Buck, 210 Wis. 2d 115, 124, 565 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245387 - 2019-08-21
at the relevant time is a legal question we review de novo. See State v. Buck, 210 Wis. 2d 115, 124, 565 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245387 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 In order to establish deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
is ultimately a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 In order to establish deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
Diane Brandmiller v. Phillip Arreola
they violate her right to travel.[3] As to the constitutional aspects of this case, our review is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16879 - 2005-03-31
they violate her right to travel.[3] As to the constitutional aspects of this case, our review is de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16879 - 2005-03-31
Holly Lynn Weiss v. City of Milwaukee
. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burkes v. Klauser, 185 Wis.2d 308, 327, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7762 - 2005-03-31
. This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Burkes v. Klauser, 185 Wis.2d 308, 327, 517 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7762 - 2005-03-31
Irene Blumer v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
with federal law. Accordingly, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review is de novo. Overview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15414 - 2005-03-31
with federal law. Accordingly, we conclude that the appropriate standard of review is de novo. Overview
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15414 - 2005-03-31
Judy Hartman v. Winnebago County
, then de novo review is appropriate.” Id. Hartman contends that they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10456 - 2005-03-31
, then de novo review is appropriate.” Id. Hartman contends that they have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10456 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald R. Kustelski v. Robin L. Taylor
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19
judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5789 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Peter J. Davies
presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v. Sweat, 208 Wis. 2d 409, 414-15, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5737 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law we decide de novo. See State v. Sweat, 208 Wis. 2d 409, 414-15, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5737 - 2017-09-19