Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25891 - 25900 of 57719 for id.
Search results 25891 - 25900 of 57719 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of an intoxicant.” Smith, 308 Wis. 2d 65, ¶15. Probable cause must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133579 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant.” Smith, 308 Wis. 2d 65, ¶15. Probable cause must be determined on a case-by-case basis. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133579 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 76
, we stop our inquiry and apply the words chosen by the legislature. Id. “[S]tatutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
, we stop our inquiry and apply the words chosen by the legislature. Id. “[S]tatutory language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436268 - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the prevailing standard: the best interests of the child.” Id. The factors listed under § 48.426(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=510208 - 2022-04-19
to the prevailing standard: the best interests of the child.” Id. The factors listed under § 48.426(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=510208 - 2022-04-19
[PDF]
State v. Jason M. Mulroy
, this court is limited to determining whether there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6594 - 2017-09-19
, this court is limited to determining whether there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
lawyer’s acts or omissions were not reasonable under prevailing professional norms. Id. at 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
lawyer’s acts or omissions were not reasonable under prevailing professional norms. Id. at 688
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98373 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law.’” Id. (citation omitted). “However, the mere existence of some alleged factual dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255068 - 2020-02-25
of law.’” Id. (citation omitted). “However, the mere existence of some alleged factual dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255068 - 2020-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy claim reviewed on appeal. Id. at 655, 657. The concern Taleronik raises in connection with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
jeopardy claim reviewed on appeal. Id. at 655, 657. The concern Taleronik raises in connection with his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36249 - 2009-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
exercised. See id., 217 Wis. 2d at 418–419, 576 N.W.2d at 925. “Discretion is erroneously exercised when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101681 - 2013-09-09
exercised. See id., 217 Wis. 2d at 418–419, 576 N.W.2d at 925. “Discretion is erroneously exercised when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101681 - 2013-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.’” Id., ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50289 - 2010-05-24
State v. Donald Savinski
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To satisfy the prejudice prong, Savinski must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11524 - 2005-03-31
’ guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment.” Id. To satisfy the prejudice prong, Savinski must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11524 - 2005-03-31