Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25891 - 25900 of 83740 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 25891 - 25900 of 83740 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
order denying his motion to compel postconviction counsel to turn over his “attorney-client” case file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101932 - 2013-09-23
order denying his motion to compel postconviction counsel to turn over his “attorney-client” case file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101932 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Thurston
in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges against him.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12426 - 2017-09-21
in the civil case. He asserted that the State was precluded from bringing criminal charges against him.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12426 - 2017-09-21
City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.
business” is at the heart of this case. In the view of the City of Janesville, a “comparable replacement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17802 - 2005-04-20
business” is at the heart of this case. In the view of the City of Janesville, a “comparable replacement
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17802 - 2005-04-20
State v. Thomas F.w.
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
argues that the appeal is moot because the order appealed from expired on January 4, 1996. A case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9582 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
did not adequately explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William McCall
connections. She answered “possibly,” to the question whether she could judge a drug case fairly. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2167 - 2017-09-19
connections. She answered “possibly,” to the question whether she could judge a drug case fairly. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2167 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Miller
case is a question of law we review independently of the trial court. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
case is a question of law we review independently of the trial court. State v. Truax, 151 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
from four Iron County Circuit Court cases—three counts of disorderly conduct, two counts of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43887 - 2009-11-23
from four Iron County Circuit Court cases—three counts of disorderly conduct, two counts of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43887 - 2009-11-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
. No. 2018AP2145-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case was unreasonable; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27
explain its decision; (2) the number of hours the attorneys worked on the case was unreasonable; (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112784 - 2014-05-27