Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 6306 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Plus Grendel Pintu Murah Lueng Bata Banda Aceh.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 6306 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Plus Grendel Pintu Murah Lueng Bata Banda Aceh.
COURT OF APPEALS
for $6240 plus interest entered against her in favor of Meadow Village, Ltd., for breach of contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31590 - 2008-01-22
for $6240 plus interest entered against her in favor of Meadow Village, Ltd., for breach of contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31590 - 2008-01-22
Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
found for Loehrke, but ordered Praxmarer to pay only $500 plus statutory costs and fees. That amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21
found for Loehrke, but ordered Praxmarer to pay only $500 plus statutory costs and fees. That amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21
COURT OF APPEALS
statement that she had made arrangements “ten plus” times for Lawrence to visit his child. After Jamie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33121 - 2008-06-23
statement that she had made arrangements “ten plus” times for Lawrence to visit his child. After Jamie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33121 - 2008-06-23
Dorothea Hackmann v. Randy Behm
. It held that Hackmann was entitled to recover $49,725, plus postjudgment interest, from the Behms pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10042 - 2005-03-31
. It held that Hackmann was entitled to recover $49,725, plus postjudgment interest, from the Behms pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10042 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Ultimately, a judgment was rendered for $450,000, plus costs and interest. Both parties now appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94205 - 2014-09-15
. Ultimately, a judgment was rendered for $450,000, plus costs and interest. Both parties now appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94205 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Melody L. Dallman
or recommendation?” ¶4 The State confirmed that the recommendation was a $100 fine plus court costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18131 - 2017-09-21
or recommendation?” ¶4 The State confirmed that the recommendation was a $100 fine plus court costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18131 - 2017-09-21
William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
on the verdict. Painter submitted a judgment for $38,250 plus costs. Zaun objected to the form of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
on the verdict. Painter submitted a judgment for $38,250 plus costs. Zaun objected to the form of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in principal, plus interest from September 1, 2001. Sawyer filed an answer, asserting ten affirmative defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
in principal, plus interest from September 1, 2001. Sawyer filed an answer, asserting ten affirmative defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30603 - 2007-10-15
[PDF]
Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
plus statutory costs and fees. That amount represents the original estimate minus the “well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21
plus statutory costs and fees. That amount represents the original estimate minus the “well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of release to extended supervision on the homicide count, plus an additional five years for the dangerous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267350 - 2020-07-07
of release to extended supervision on the homicide count, plus an additional five years for the dangerous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=267350 - 2020-07-07