Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 30059 for de.

Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31

State v. Barry R. Drews
concentration in a driver’s body is reasonable is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15933 - 2005-03-31

State v. Keith S. Betts
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
an order for summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Yahnke v. Carson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49926 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 54
judgment de novo, using the same methodology of the circuit court. Phillips v. Parmelee, 2013 WI 105
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109697 - 2017-09-21

May a judge or the judge's staff attend a holiday party given by a law firm some of whose members appear before the judge?
Yes, if of a de minimis nature
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=887 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
charges associated with the time and materials needed to complete the project. La Velle v. De Luca, 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564120 - 2022-09-09

[PDF] Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15563 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14

Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as that employed by the circuit court. See Shannon v. Shannon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2005-03-31