Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 29821 for des.
Search results 2591 - 2600 of 29821 for des.
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14589 - 2005-03-31
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14589 - 2005-03-31
Caryl J. Keip v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
than de novo, the Court noted that even where full knowledge of the factual setting could be acquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3365 - 2005-03-31
than de novo, the Court noted that even where full knowledge of the factual setting could be acquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith S. Betts
review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4538 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4538 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. Additional facts are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
. Additional facts are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380690 - 2021-06-29
review de novo.” State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380690 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
WI APP 102
court. We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36717 - 2014-09-15
court. We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
which we decide de novo. State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d 687 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19
which we decide de novo. State v. Kasian, 207 Wis. 2d 611, 621, 558 N.W.2d 687 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo a grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44175 - 2014-09-15
are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo a grant of summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44175 - 2014-09-15
State v. Richard G. B.
, and our review is de novo. State v. Jagielski, 161 Wis. 2d 67, 467 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App.1991). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5258 - 2005-03-31
, and our review is de novo. State v. Jagielski, 161 Wis. 2d 67, 467 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App.1991). ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5258 - 2005-03-31