Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 29823 for des.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
placement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Cheryl F. v. Sheboygan Cty., 170 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214930 - 2018-06-28
placement is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Cheryl F. v. Sheboygan Cty., 170 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214930 - 2018-06-28
[PDF]
State v. Edward D. Anderson
that he or she was denied the right to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. The first inquiry is always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
that he or she was denied the right to a speedy trial de novo. Id. at 508. The first inquiry is always
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19746 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Barreau, 2002 WI App 198, ¶48, 257 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166125 - 2017-09-21
of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Barreau, 2002 WI App 198, ¶48, 257 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166125 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or other mandatory duties at a plea hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Brown, 239 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
or other mandatory duties at a plea hearing is a question of law we review de novo.” Brown, 239 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215209 - 2018-07-10
State v. Vernell T. Williams
court meet the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4929 - 2005-03-31
court meet the constitutional standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Krier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4929 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32451 - 2008-04-15
a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32451 - 2008-04-15
[PDF]
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15999 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. Guenther
are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19061 - 2017-09-21
are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19061 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Arik J. Guenther
are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19060 - 2017-09-21
are reviewed on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19060 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo; for example, whether the court exceeded its “clarifying” function and improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255598 - 2020-03-03
review de novo; for example, whether the court exceeded its “clarifying” function and improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255598 - 2020-03-03