Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 29823 for des.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Debra L. Kontowicz v. American Standard Insurance Co. of Wisconsin
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d Nos. 03-2177 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6768 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d Nos. 03-2177 03
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6768 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
William Jungbauer v. Polk County
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2789 - 2017-09-19
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel. Sielen v. Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2789 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jonathan Snapp v. Jessie Jean-Claude, M.D.
is a question of law that we consider de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20970 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we consider de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20970 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark T. Smith
of his right to present a defense is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Id., ¶69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31
of his right to present a defense is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. Id., ¶69
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6931 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Latosha Armstead
this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115, 121 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13160 - 2017-09-21
this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301, 541 N.W.2d 115, 121 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13160 - 2017-09-21
Karen Wipperfurth v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11359 - 2005-03-31
and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology and standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11359 - 2005-03-31
Lenticular Europe, LLC v. William T. Cunnally
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31
of law, we review those legal rulings de novo. Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County, 2004 WI App 35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7470 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] Standard of Review ¶14 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85378 - 2012-07-25
] Standard of Review ¶14 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85378 - 2012-07-25
State v. Paul Venema
and application of the statute to a set of facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4386 - 2005-03-31
and application of the statute to a set of facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4386 - 2005-03-31
Nancy Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.
judgments de novo, using the same method as the circuit court. Alvarado v. Sersch, 2003 WI 55, ¶10, 262 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16685 - 2005-03-31
judgments de novo, using the same method as the circuit court. Alvarado v. Sersch, 2003 WI 55, ¶10, 262 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16685 - 2005-03-31