Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 33975 for dismissed.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 33975 for dismissed.
[PDF]
State v. Steven L. Harris
, the appeal was dismissed in favor of allowing Harris to pursue an additional pro se RULE 809.30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20351 - 2017-09-21
, the appeal was dismissed in favor of allowing Harris to pursue an additional pro se RULE 809.30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer V.
. The following day the county moved to dismiss the CHIPS petition it had filed regarding Kody, and he was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9900 - 2017-09-19
. The following day the county moved to dismiss the CHIPS petition it had filed regarding Kody, and he was found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9900 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donna Sue Spielman v. Jeffrey Allen Spielman
. 2 Donna argues that Jeffrey’s appeal should be dismissed as untimely because it was not filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3030 - 2017-09-19
. 2 Donna argues that Jeffrey’s appeal should be dismissed as untimely because it was not filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Donnie Cobbs
enhancer would be dismissed in exchange for a guilty plea on the burglary, thus reducing Cobbs’ potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12530 - 2017-09-21
enhancer would be dismissed in exchange for a guilty plea on the burglary, thus reducing Cobbs’ potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12530 - 2017-09-21
State v. Edward J. Heuer
. Subsequently, Attorney Martin filed a motion to dismiss on behalf of Heuer, claiming that his rights under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31
. Subsequently, Attorney Martin filed a motion to dismiss on behalf of Heuer, claiming that his rights under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Schleinitz’s will. The court dismissed the petition as untimely. ¶5 In 2006, the Maclays brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
Schleinitz’s will. The court dismissed the petition as untimely. ¶5 In 2006, the Maclays brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
State v. Mitchell Miller
guilty to armed robbery (count one) in exchange for the State’s motion to dismiss counts two and three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
guilty to armed robbery (count one) in exchange for the State’s motion to dismiss counts two and three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
State v. Donyil Anderson
plea on Anderson's behalf. Following denial of a suppression motion,[2] the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10935 - 2005-03-31
plea on Anderson's behalf. Following denial of a suppression motion,[2] the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Thomas
Thomas's character. The court noted that Thomas's actions could not be dismissed as youthful indiscretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9767 - 2017-09-19
Thomas's character. The court noted that Thomas's actions could not be dismissed as youthful indiscretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9767 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
It concluded that dismissal was not an available remedy for a violation of his prompt disposition right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199863 - 2017-11-01
It concluded that dismissal was not an available remedy for a violation of his prompt disposition right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199863 - 2017-11-01