Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 66177 for e j.

State v. Cynthia M.
: Joseph R. Wall, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Cynthia M. appeals an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18

[PDF] IW-1789T - Order for Change in Placement with Termination of Parental Rights Notice (In-Home to Out-of-Home Placement Only) - Indian Child Welfare Act
conducted and notice provided. E. A permanency plan consistent with the court’s Order shall be filed
/formdisplay/IW-1789T.pdf?formNumber=IW-1789T&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-01-07

State v. Randy R. Cooke
from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Kenosha County: bruce e. schroeder, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, J. Per curiam opinions may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638203 - 2023-03-28

Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and F. Thomas Creeron III, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Chad A. Achterberg
REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Affirmed. WILLIAM A. BABLITCH, J. Chad A. Achterberg
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16972 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Carolyn G.
. JOHNSTON, Judge. Affirmed. ROGGENSACK, J.1 Carolyn G. appeals the termination of her parental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14130 - 2014-09-15

State v. Scott G. Zuniga
, the cause was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Alan Lee, assistant attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4503 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Scott G. Zuniga
was submitted on the brief of James E. Doyle, attorney general, and Alan Lee, assistant attorney general
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4503 - 2017-09-19

State v. Jack Williams
considers to be newly-discovered evidence, which he terms “[t]he [e]xtent of [his] [m]ental [d]efect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9559 - 2005-03-31