Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 51895 for him.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 51895 for him.
Joseph P. LaPere v. June Gengler
. As a result of this decision, the State agreed to return to LaPere the good time that was taken from him when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15356 - 2005-03-31
. As a result of this decision, the State agreed to return to LaPere the good time that was taken from him when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15356 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
staying it. No. That’s a carrot I’ll throw out in front of him. But we’ll wait to see how he does. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31129 - 2007-12-11
staying it. No. That’s a carrot I’ll throw out in front of him. But we’ll wait to see how he does. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31129 - 2007-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
on his religious freedoms; therefore, the court erred when it denied him a hearing on the issue and when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
on his religious freedoms; therefore, the court erred when it denied him a hearing on the issue and when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142942 - 2015-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment ordering him to sell back to the EPIK Corporation his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27301 - 2006-12-04
appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment ordering him to sell back to the EPIK Corporation his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27301 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Lewis
. No. 03-3191-CR 4 ¶8 The jury returned a verdict finding him not guilty on count two, a charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7085 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-3191-CR 4 ¶8 The jury returned a verdict finding him not guilty on count two, a charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7085 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
that could be read to suggest that Washington’s counsel did not know why the defendant had given him those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=784440 - 2024-04-04
that could be read to suggest that Washington’s counsel did not know why the defendant had given him those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=784440 - 2024-04-04
[PDF]
Frontsheet
have known him since 2013. Each commented positively on Attorney Cooper's integrity and character
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210467 - 2018-03-30
have known him since 2013. Each commented positively on Attorney Cooper's integrity and character
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210467 - 2018-03-30
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J.W.
him with the warnings mandated by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21
him with the warnings mandated by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12110 - 2017-09-21
Village of Elm Grove v. Michael R. Johnson
, at approximately 1:07 a.m., Officer Joseph T. Ipavec observed a vehicle directly in front of him and noted that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6080 - 2005-03-31
, at approximately 1:07 a.m., Officer Joseph T. Ipavec observed a vehicle directly in front of him and noted that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6080 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. Rochelle D.
and intelligently entered; (2) the circuit court did not properly notify him of his right to substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3425 - 2017-09-19
and intelligently entered; (2) the circuit court did not properly notify him of his right to substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3425 - 2017-09-19