Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25901 - 25910 of 64027 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and was made in accordance with the facts of record. State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201651 - 2017-11-09

[PDF] Sandra L. Wojtasiak v. Podiatry Associates
and in accordance with the facts of record. Id. We sustain the trial court’s discretionary decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4301 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and has filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205687 - 2017-12-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of fact and evidence taken from the record viewed in a light that supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182881 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
an unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the Record for the sentence at issue. See State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79392 - 2012-03-12

[PDF] Melanie A.W. v. Patrick L.W.
. 806.06 (1)(b) or 807.11(2). (b) Recorded in docket entries in ch. 799 cases. (c) Recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3366 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplemental no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=512468 - 2022-04-21

Wilson Realty Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Board of Review for the City of Milwaukee
, the record reflects that the first level was not available—there was no recent sale of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7474 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
review the record in the light most favorable to the trial court’s findings. Rohde-Giovanni v. Baumgart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106567 - 2014-01-14

COURT OF APPEALS
, in the context of the entire record, that trial counsel’s failure to impeach that witness with his three prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12