Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25911 - 25920 of 83945 for case search.
Search results 25911 - 25920 of 83945 for case search.
Timothy W. Steffen v. Vernon Luecht
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14991 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14991 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Timothy W. Steffen v. Vernon Luecht
2000 WI App 56 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14991 - 2017-09-21
2000 WI App 56 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0100
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
this is a close case, we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments did not constitute a material and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
this is a close case, we conclude that the prosecutor’s comments did not constitute a material and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=613536 - 2023-01-24
State v. John F. Goralski
of expert testimony in such cases constitutes an insufficiency of proof. State v. Doerr, 229 Wis. 2d 616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31
of expert testimony in such cases constitutes an insufficiency of proof. State v. Doerr, 229 Wis. 2d 616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3187 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen R. Hart
was "the strength of this case."[1] After Reichert testified, the jury was excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
was "the strength of this case."[1] After Reichert testified, the jury was excused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8129 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
& Associates to represent him in four cases that had been filed against him. At their initial meeting on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11
& Associates to represent him in four cases that had been filed against him. At their initial meeting on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45529 - 2010-01-11
Randall Schwartz v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
2002 WI App 255 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0372 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4926 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 255 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0372 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4926 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
guilty plea and other conditions. A.A. was never called as a witness. ¶4 The case hinged almost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199648 - 2017-11-24
guilty plea and other conditions. A.A. was never called as a witness. ¶4 The case hinged almost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199648 - 2017-11-24
[PDF]
WI App 3
2019 WI App 3 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2017AP1977-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230542 - 2019-02-08
2019 WI App 3 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2017AP1977-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230542 - 2019-02-08
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2009AP1874-AC Cir. Ct. No. 2008CV18220
in this case dispute whether a direct legislation ballot question put before the voters of the City
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47139 - 2014-09-15
in this case dispute whether a direct legislation ballot question put before the voters of the City
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47139 - 2014-09-15