Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25911 - 25920 of 29984 for de.
Search results 25911 - 25920 of 29984 for de.
State v. Thomas M. Stockland
is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis. 2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Hansen, 168 Wis. 2d 749, 755, 485 N.W.2d 74 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5541 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of law. Id. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36103 - 2009-04-07
of law. Id. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36103 - 2009-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Barritt v. Lowe, 2003 WI App 185, ¶6, 266 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135632 - 2015-02-25
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Barritt v. Lowe, 2003 WI App 185, ¶6, 266 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135632 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Eason, 245 Wis. 2d 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998345 - 2025-08-20
review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” Eason, 245 Wis. 2d 206
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=998345 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061956 - 2026-01-13
review de novo.” E-Z Roll Off, LLC v. County of Oneida, 2011 WI 71, ¶16, 335 Wis. 2d 720, 800 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1061956 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ultimately a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 In order to establish deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
is ultimately a question of law that we decide de novo. Id. ¶15 In order to establish deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938364 - 2025-04-08
Terry L. Quinn v. James E. Riley
judgment. Our review is de novo, and we apply the same standard as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5933 - 2005-03-31
judgment. Our review is de novo, and we apply the same standard as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5933 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
[that] we review de novo but give appropriate deference.” Patrick Cudahy Inc. v. LIRC, 2006 WI App 211, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131809 - 2014-12-15
[that] we review de novo but give appropriate deference.” Patrick Cudahy Inc. v. LIRC, 2006 WI App 211, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131809 - 2014-12-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29550 - 2007-07-02
the record de novo, applying the same standard and following the same methodology required of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29550 - 2007-07-02
[PDF]
R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
procedures violated Nielsen’s due process rights is a question of law subject to our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14226 - 2014-09-15
procedures violated Nielsen’s due process rights is a question of law subject to our de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14226 - 2014-09-15