Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25911 - 25920 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 25911 - 25920 of 63981 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
references to the record.” McGee’s brief fails to provide an adequate statement of facts relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63113 - 2011-04-25
references to the record.” McGee’s brief fails to provide an adequate statement of facts relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63113 - 2011-04-25
[PDF]
State v. Jerome W.
the record to determine whether it contained evidence to support such a determination. R.A.C.P. v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20227 - 2017-09-21
the record to determine whether it contained evidence to support such a determination. R.A.C.P. v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20227 - 2017-09-21
Scott Mullen v. Gerald VandeVoort
right to a trial de novo. Our review of the record reveals that he was granted a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5589 - 2005-03-31
right to a trial de novo. Our review of the record reveals that he was granted a de novo trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5589 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP972 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
. No. 2024AP972 2 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
, in the context of the entire record, that trial counsel’s failure to impeach that witness with his three prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
, in the context of the entire record, that trial counsel’s failure to impeach that witness with his three prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
[PDF]
John L. Burns v. Douglas M. Scheel
that the trial court's first result was correct. The record demonstrates that this is a case of unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11789 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court's first result was correct. The record demonstrates that this is a case of unexplained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11789 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict. Id., ¶¶38-39. We will search the record for credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99612 - 2013-07-23
the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict. Id., ¶¶38-39. We will search the record for credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99612 - 2013-07-23
State v. Cornelius F.
parental rights. From the record, there is nothing to show that he was treated unfairly. He cannot make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5915 - 2005-03-31
parental rights. From the record, there is nothing to show that he was treated unfairly. He cannot make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5915 - 2005-03-31
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
record had no relevance to the day-to-day operations, and that Whiterabbit’s rental therefore could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
record had no relevance to the day-to-day operations, and that Whiterabbit’s rental therefore could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith S. Krause
. No conviction related to the September 2000 arrest appears on Krause’s record. ¶3 The case before us stems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21166 - 2017-09-21
. No conviction related to the September 2000 arrest appears on Krause’s record. ¶3 The case before us stems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21166 - 2017-09-21

