Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25921 - 25930 of 58277 for speedy trial.
Search results 25921 - 25930 of 58277 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
, we affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2 The trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06
, we affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2 The trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in determining whether to order the State to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in determining whether to order the State to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50286 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Suzette M. Ward
sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), STATS. She argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14446 - 2017-09-21
sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), STATS. She argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14446 - 2017-09-21
Nekoosa Papers, Inc. v. Magnum Timber Corporation
. This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in which the trial court determined that an agreement between Nekoosa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2848 - 2005-03-31
. This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in which the trial court determined that an agreement between Nekoosa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2848 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deidra J.
from litigating a trial court’s competency to grant a dispositional extension in a prior CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15481 - 2005-03-31
from litigating a trial court’s competency to grant a dispositional extension in a prior CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child under thirteen after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160249 - 2017-09-21
a judgment convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child under thirteen after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160249 - 2017-09-21
State v. Suzette M. Ward
to protect a child from sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), Stats. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31
to protect a child from sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), Stats. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 KLOPPENBURG, J. The evening before trial was to begin, the prosecutor disclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93381 - 2014-09-15
and Kloppenburg, JJ. ¶1 KLOPPENBURG, J. The evening before trial was to begin, the prosecutor disclosed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93381 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for indefiniteness, the damage award is excessive, and the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143686 - 2015-06-30
for indefiniteness, the damage award is excessive, and the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143686 - 2015-06-30
[PDF]
Nekoosa Papers, Inc. v. Magnum Timber Corporation
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, P.J. This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2848 - 2017-09-19
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, P.J. This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2848 - 2017-09-19