Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25931 - 25940 of 52769 for address.
Search results 25931 - 25940 of 52769 for address.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 2, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appe...
that Fisher was in custody.[1] We are reluctant to address the merits of this argument because Fisher fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47333 - 2010-03-01
that Fisher was in custody.[1] We are reluctant to address the merits of this argument because Fisher fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47333 - 2010-03-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) in determining that the outstanding principal balance on the note was $142,812.43. We address each argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191378 - 2017-09-21
) in determining that the outstanding principal balance on the note was $142,812.43. We address each argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191378 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
petitions, the trial court lost competency to act on this matter. The competency of the court “addresses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264665 - 2020-06-16
petitions, the trial court lost competency to act on this matter. The competency of the court “addresses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264665 - 2020-06-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
properly exercised its discretion by accepting a late submission from her. We address those issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77326 - 2014-09-15
properly exercised its discretion by accepting a late submission from her. We address those issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77326 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
regarding the frisk was addressed after he raised it in his 2003 motion. His complaint of error regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48694 - 2010-04-05
regarding the frisk was addressed after he raised it in his 2003 motion. His complaint of error regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48694 - 2010-04-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
addresses written agreements “determining all or a portion of the common boundary line between [two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74685 - 2014-09-15
addresses written agreements “determining all or a portion of the common boundary line between [two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74685 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as both advocate and judge” and, therefore, we decline to address the allegation. See State v. Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219176 - 2018-09-18
as both advocate and judge” and, therefore, we decline to address the allegation. See State v. Pettit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219176 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
based on all the information describing a connection between [Harris’s home] address and drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
based on all the information describing a connection between [Harris’s home] address and drug
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109118 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
address Marcelle’s argument that the circuit court erred by denying his request for new counsel.2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753851 - 2024-01-24
address Marcelle’s argument that the circuit court erred by denying his request for new counsel.2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753851 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the seizure, the mission being “to address the traffic violation that warranted the stop … and [to] attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175477 - 2017-09-21
of the seizure, the mission being “to address the traffic violation that warranted the stop … and [to] attend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175477 - 2017-09-21