Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25931 - 25940 of 63537 for records.

[PDF] NOTICE
on gender and further emphasized multiple factors, which had been stated on the record, that justified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey Donald Leiser
offender. The trial court denied the motion without a Machner[3] hearing. If the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20285 - 2005-11-22

COURT OF APPEALS
state on the record its reasons for selecting the particular sentence imposed. Gallion, 270 Wis. 2d 535
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107796 - 2014-02-11

[PDF] Alvin Herlache v. Robin Zahran
, nothing in the record compelled the trial court to find, as requested by the Zahrans
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2840 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
case there is no indication in the record, nor do the parties contend, that S.A.M. was subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15

State v. Timothy J. Helm
it is “based upon a desire to implement the original dispositional scheme as manifested by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4361 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745631 - 2023-12-28

State v. Stanley F. Toczynski
a proper offer of proof. As the attorney general points out, the record does not suggest that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9125 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carolyn G.
indicating trial would occur on that date. The record reflects that Carolyn was previously advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5013 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carolyn G.
indicating trial would occur on that date. The record reflects that Carolyn was previously advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5012 - 2005-03-31