Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25931 - 25940 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 25931 - 25940 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
to suppress evidence in this drunk driving case. The State argues that the trial court erred in suppressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4695 - 2017-09-19
to suppress evidence in this drunk driving case. The State argues that the trial court erred in suppressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4695 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial. Based on my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062947 - 2026-01-15
trial. Based on my review of the briefs and record, I conclude that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062947 - 2026-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] He claims that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in determining whether to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50286 - 2010-05-24
] He claims that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard in determining whether to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50286 - 2010-05-24
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency to stand trial. The State argues that the circuit erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19
for redetermination of Keith M. Carey’s competency to stand trial. The State argues that the circuit erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard D. Martin
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
conviction, contending that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.63(1)(a). Tadych raises two challenges on appeal. First, Tadych contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46028 - 2010-01-19
. § 346.63(1)(a). Tadych raises two challenges on appeal. First, Tadych contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46028 - 2010-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, we affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2 The trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06
, we affirm the order of the trial court. ¶2 The trial court granted summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74750 - 2011-12-06
Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
of the dispositional order. The trial court found that “a request was made” for the extension and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31
of the dispositional order. The trial court found that “a request was made” for the extension and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3455 - 2005-03-31
State v. Suzette M. Ward
to protect a child from sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), Stats. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31
to protect a child from sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), Stats. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31
David C. Williams v. City of Lake Geneva
ANDERSON, J. This is a liquor licensing issue. David C. Williams appeals from a trial court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4123 - 2005-03-31
ANDERSON, J. This is a liquor licensing issue. David C. Williams appeals from a trial court judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4123 - 2005-03-31

