Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25931 - 25940 of 43150 for t o.
Search results 25931 - 25940 of 43150 for t o.
[PDF]
State v. Marika W.
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: FRANCIS T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5960 - 2017-09-19
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: FRANCIS T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5960 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
Affirmed 2016AP001460 State v. P. T. 1 01-24-2017 Affirmed 2016AP001808 CR State v. Brandon M
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186309 - 2017-09-21
Affirmed 2016AP001460 State v. P. T. 1 01-24-2017 Affirmed 2016AP001808 CR State v. Brandon M
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher D. Rose
an investigatory seizure, “[t]he police must have a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific articulable facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7238 - 2017-09-20
an investigatory seizure, “[t]he police must have a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific articulable facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7238 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641016 - 2023-04-05
will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641016 - 2023-04-05
City of Horicon v. Karl K. Albert
provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15274 - 2005-03-31
provides that “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15274 - 2005-03-31
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Tawanna W.
t. werner, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Tawanna W. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7468 - 2005-03-31
t. werner, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Tawanna W. appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7468 - 2005-03-31
October Table of unpublished opinions
Affirmed 04-0952-CR State v. Nathan T. Moore
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39 - 2004-11-08
Affirmed 04-0952-CR State v. Nathan T. Moore
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39 - 2004-11-08
State v. Scott K. Schaefer
(1968), the Court concluded: “[T]here must be a narrowly drawn authority to permit a reasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31
(1968), the Court concluded: “[T]here must be a narrowly drawn authority to permit a reasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9840 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on this case. ¶2 On appeal, the State admits that “[t]his court can assume Branch was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143694 - 2015-06-30
on this case. ¶2 On appeal, the State admits that “[t]his court can assume Branch was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143694 - 2015-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
Kallenberg because he violated Wis. Stat. § 346.13(1), which provides that “[t]he operator of a vehicle shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16
Kallenberg because he violated Wis. Stat. § 346.13(1), which provides that “[t]he operator of a vehicle shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69508 - 2011-08-16