Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25941 - 25950 of 58483 for speedy trial.

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Johnnie B.P.
to his six-year-old son, Brack. He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2740 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert J. Myers
the influence of an intoxicant, contrary to § 346.63(1), Stats. He contends the trial court erroneously denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9006 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was charged with communicating with jurors during a trial in which he was the defendant and contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190792 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child under thirteen after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160249 - 2017-09-21

State v. Suzette M. Ward
to protect a child from sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), Stats. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an incident at Bradford High School in Kenosha (“Bradford”) on April 5, 2019. A court trial was held on May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307015 - 2020-11-25

[PDF] Nekoosa Papers, Inc. v. Magnum Timber Corporation
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 DYKMAN, P.J. This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in which the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2848 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
modules, and communicating with him. After a two-day bench trial, the court found Shong guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142995 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael Wendt v. John H. Blazek
to maintain and use a pier at the water’s edge of the easement. 1 We affirm the trial court’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3007 - 2017-09-19

Nekoosa Papers, Inc. v. Magnum Timber Corporation
. This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in which the trial court determined that an agreement between Nekoosa
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2848 - 2005-03-31