Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25951 - 25960 of 91503 for 1.
Search results 25951 - 25960 of 91503 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 1, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143517 - 2015-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 1, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143517 - 2015-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert and Rhonda Niedzwiecki appeal a judgment awarding Edward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
and Hruz, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Robert and Rhonda Niedzwiecki appeal a judgment awarding Edward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
: timothy g. dugan, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33908 - 2008-09-02
: timothy g. dugan, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33908 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM.[1] Bert Roehl appeals an order granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03
, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM.[1] Bert Roehl appeals an order granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34767 - 2008-12-03
State v. Johnny M. Lacy
County: Steven D. Ebert, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
County: Steven D. Ebert, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12);[1] see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109299 - 2014-04-15
as appellate counsel. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2011-12);[1] see also Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109299 - 2014-04-15
State v. Russell Martin
.[1] On appeal, Martin seeks a new trial because evidence was admitted contrary to the prohibitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10440 - 2005-03-31
.[1] On appeal, Martin seeks a new trial because evidence was admitted contrary to the prohibitions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2012AP112 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Linda Krings appeals a postdivorce order requiring her to split
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89039 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP112 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Linda Krings appeals a postdivorce order requiring her to split
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89039 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Demell V. Glenn
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Demell V. Glenn appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2457 - 2017-09-19
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Demell V. Glenn appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2457 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: WILLIAM DOMINA, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2013AP2644-FT 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108947 - 2017-09-21
for Waukesha County: WILLIAM DOMINA, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2013AP2644-FT 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108947 - 2017-09-21