Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25951 - 25960 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 25951 - 25960 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
was Metz’s failure to act.” Rather, she claims, it was the prosecution that was duplicitous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72316 - 2011-01-28
was Metz’s failure to act.” Rather, she claims, it was the prosecution that was duplicitous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72316 - 2011-01-28
[PDF]
Robert W. Probst v. Peter Chen
by demanding that Chen return his money. Chen refused, claiming Probst should have inspected the unit before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6851 - 2017-09-20
by demanding that Chen return his money. Chen refused, claiming Probst should have inspected the unit before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6851 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction. Gardner filed postconviction motions for a new trial, claiming, in relevant part, that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
conviction. Gardner filed postconviction motions for a new trial, claiming, in relevant part, that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36269 - 2009-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
the victim as evidenced by the photographs of her injuries, and she rejected Rivera’s claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
the victim as evidenced by the photographs of her injuries, and she rejected Rivera’s claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. A highly intoxicated Eckstein claimed he did not recall being in the car. His theory of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25
. A highly intoxicated Eckstein claimed he did not recall being in the car. His theory of defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108236 - 2014-02-25
State v. Antonio Jackson
Jackson claims that the prosecutor: (1) on at least three occasions, improperly vouched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
Jackson claims that the prosecutor: (1) on at least three occasions, improperly vouched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18286 - 2005-05-31
Robert Skenandore v. Michael J. Sullivan
his petition for a writ of certiorari. He claims the trial court erred in refusing to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14888 - 2005-03-31
his petition for a writ of certiorari. He claims the trial court erred in refusing to grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14888 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald L. Dantuma
really considering it, ruling only that a related rule—claim preclusion—didn’t apply. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
really considering it, ruling only that a related rule—claim preclusion—didn’t apply. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 6, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Because we reject all of Meier’s claims of error, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27340 - 2007-11-28
. Because we reject all of Meier’s claims of error, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27340 - 2007-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
inquiry. First, we examine the facts of the insured’s claim to determine whether the claim falls within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142982 - 2015-06-10
inquiry. First, we examine the facts of the insured’s claim to determine whether the claim falls within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142982 - 2015-06-10