Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25961 - 25970 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 25961 - 25970 of 33989 for dismissal.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David R. Nott
the client of the result and dismissal of his case. On June 5, 2000, Attorney Nott's Wisconsin law license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16653 - 2005-03-31
the client of the result and dismissal of his case. On June 5, 2000, Attorney Nott's Wisconsin law license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16653 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
charges were dismissed outright. [5] In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194, 203, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16
charges were dismissed outright. [5] In State v. Klessig, 211 Wis. 2d 194, 203, 564 N.W.2d 716 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101959 - 2013-09-16
CA Blank Order
with the aforementioned crime and one felony count of possessing narcotics (Oxycodone). The felony count was dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-11
with the aforementioned crime and one felony count of possessing narcotics (Oxycodone). The felony count was dismissed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-11
State v. Christ Groh
concentration (PAC). See § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), Stats. On the State’s motion, the court dismissed the PAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
concentration (PAC). See § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), Stats. On the State’s motion, the court dismissed the PAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee Post #2874 v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
judgment to the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (RACM), dismissing its challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
judgment to the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (RACM), dismissing its challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
judgment before the plaintiffs-homeowners explained their claims. It argues that the dismissal prejudices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
judgment before the plaintiffs-homeowners explained their claims. It argues that the dismissal prejudices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority v. Robert W. Stanek
, the trial court properly dismissed the counterclaim as untimely filed.3 The Staneks have failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
, the trial court properly dismissed the counterclaim as untimely filed.3 The Staneks have failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3338 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jason R.N.
counsel's motions for dismissal, the court imposed the requested sanction and this appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9253 - 2005-03-31
counsel's motions for dismissal, the court imposed the requested sanction and this appeal followed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9253 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth J. Piltz
). ¶6 Had Piltz moved to dismiss the charge in question before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7460 - 2005-03-31
). ¶6 Had Piltz moved to dismiss the charge in question before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7460 - 2005-03-31
Certification
and Moores moved to dismiss the complaint on the principle that one cannot sue oneself, pointing out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33168 - 2008-06-25
and Moores moved to dismiss the complaint on the principle that one cannot sue oneself, pointing out
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33168 - 2008-06-25