Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25961 - 25970 of 65137 for or b.
Search results 25961 - 25970 of 65137 for or b.
[PDF]
NOTICE
alcohol concentration in excess of 0.08, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b), third offense. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59077 - 2014-09-15
alcohol concentration in excess of 0.08, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(b), third offense. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59077 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Daniel S. Stasiewicz v. Juan Pagan, Jr.
PART B WISCONSIN PHYSICIANS SERVICE, SUBROGATED PARTIES-DEFENDANTS. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3882 - 2017-09-20
PART B WISCONSIN PHYSICIANS SERVICE, SUBROGATED PARTIES-DEFENDANTS. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3882 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Arturo Melendez
the State’s recommendation and that Melendez is not entitled to be resentenced. B. Harsh and excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12133 - 2017-09-21
the State’s recommendation and that Melendez is not entitled to be resentenced. B. Harsh and excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12133 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William Medina
of the defendant. Section 971.165(1)(b). The defendant bears the burden of establishing his or her lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13376 - 2017-09-21
of the defendant. Section 971.165(1)(b). The defendant bears the burden of establishing his or her lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Milton H. Smith
is broken down into two sections, marked “A” and “B.” The “A” section consists of five paragraphs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15286 - 2017-09-21
is broken down into two sections, marked “A” and “B.” The “A” section consists of five paragraphs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Peterson was charged with theft contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(b). ¶3 At trial, Peterson’s defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52587 - 2014-09-15
, Peterson was charged with theft contrary to WIS. STAT. § 943.20(1)(b). ¶3 At trial, Peterson’s defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52587 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel F. Kratochwill
)(a) and (b), STATS., or other mandated procedures are not followed at the plea hearing, the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10390 - 2017-09-20
)(a) and (b), STATS., or other mandated procedures are not followed at the plea hearing, the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10390 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Curtis E. Dittberner
to arrest Dittberner for OMVWI. B. Blood Test Refusal ¶10 Dittberner claims that Officer Kendall never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
to arrest Dittberner for OMVWI. B. Blood Test Refusal ¶10 Dittberner claims that Officer Kendall never
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3291 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Cecil L., Jr.
), particularly emphasizing the seriousness of the offense, see WIS. STAT. § 938.18(5)(b), and Cecil’s role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
), particularly emphasizing the seriousness of the offense, see WIS. STAT. § 938.18(5)(b), and Cecil’s role
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5866 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The holding in Smith was fact specific, as is every prejudice determination. There, we explained, “[B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
. The holding in Smith was fact specific, as is every prejudice determination. There, we explained, “[B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15