Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25971 - 25980 of 29823 for des.
Search results 25971 - 25980 of 29823 for des.
Terry L. Quinn v. James E. Riley
judgment. Our review is de novo, and we apply the same standard as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5933 - 2005-03-31
judgment. Our review is de novo, and we apply the same standard as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 181
the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26175 - 2014-09-15
the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law that we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26175 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Raul J. Walters v. National Properties, LLC
lease, and determine the parties' rights under that lease, we exercise de novo review. Westhaven
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18699 - 2017-09-21
lease, and determine the parties' rights under that lease, we exercise de novo review. Westhaven
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18699 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy R. Stankus
subject to our de novo review, see State v. Xiong, 178 Wis.2d 525, 531, 504 N.W.2d 428, 430 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12782 - 2017-09-21
subject to our de novo review, see State v. Xiong, 178 Wis.2d 525, 531, 504 N.W.2d 428, 430 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12782 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
[PDF]
WI App 72
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426886 - 2021-11-16
of constitutional fact.” State v. Popke, 2009 WI 37, ¶10, 317 Wis. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426886 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the circuit court. See Roberts v. T.H.E. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174334 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the circuit court. See Roberts v. T.H.E. Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174334 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Darrin E. Parnell
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15999 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App. 1997). We review de novo whether the evidence before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 2
on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91260 - 2014-09-15
on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91260 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21