Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25971 - 25980 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Lafayette County Department of Human Services v. Renee J. M.
. § 48.365 had not been filed with the court prior to the expiration of the dispositional order. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3455 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of first-degree sexual assault of a child under thirteen after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160249 - 2017-09-21

State v. Suzette M. Ward
to protect a child from sexual assault, contrary to § 948.02(3), Stats. She argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14446 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 346.63(1)(a). Tadych raises two challenges on appeal. First, Tadych contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46028 - 2012-01-22

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
an order of the trial court adjudicating their mother, Pearl E.J., incompetent due to the infirmities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28296 - 2007-03-06

[PDF] Susann M. Vander Wielen v. Ronald E. Van Asten
the trial court erred in determining that (1) the tenant was not a holdover, year-to-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19710 - 2017-09-21

Ingo Stange v. Jane Stange
judgment relating to maintenance, child support and property division. She contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2493 - 2005-03-31

Kevin Kirsch v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The trial court entered a permanent injunction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15762 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Ingo Stange v. Jane Stange
to maintenance, child support and property division. She No. 00-1005 2 contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2493 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
also contends that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to seek suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=526870 - 2022-06-01