Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25981 - 25990 of 69084 for as he.
Search results 25981 - 25990 of 69084 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06, acting pro se. He argued that he received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219253 - 2018-09-14
postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06, acting pro se. He argued that he received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219253 - 2018-09-14
State v. Clifford J. Lennie
% or more. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his "motion to suppress evidence based upon lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11983 - 2005-03-31
% or more. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his "motion to suppress evidence based upon lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11983 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark H.K.
to property, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.01(1).[2] He argues that the evidence that he urinated on post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
to property, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 943.01(1).[2] He argues that the evidence that he urinated on post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J. P., Jr.
to support the extension and that he was wrongly allowed to represent himself during the commitment hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26123 - 2017-09-21
to support the extension and that he was wrongly allowed to represent himself during the commitment hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Vivian Jensen v. John A. Jrolf
, or interest in certain real estate owned by Vivian Jensen. Jrolf contends that he had complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10394 - 2017-09-20
, or interest in certain real estate owned by Vivian Jensen. Jrolf contends that he had complied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10394 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. David A. Braden
contained false information on prior sexual misconduct, some of which he claims was thirty-five- years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13820 - 2014-09-15
contained false information on prior sexual misconduct, some of which he claims was thirty-five- years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13820 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony he did not hear. He further argues that Judge Perlich’s decision was a valid exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41947 - 2009-10-07
testimony he did not hear. He further argues that Judge Perlich’s decision was a valid exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41947 - 2009-10-07
[PDF]
Lamonte Simmons v. Jeffrey Endicott
Institution. Simmons argues he was denied his right to confront the witnesses against him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7921 - 2017-09-19
Institution. Simmons argues he was denied his right to confront the witnesses against him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7921 - 2017-09-19
Henry D. Witkowski v. County of Milwaukee
from various County psychiatrists. Witkowski alleges that he suffered permanent injuries, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8474 - 2005-03-31
from various County psychiatrists. Witkowski alleges that he suffered permanent injuries, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8474 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stanley Earl Applebee
, Applebee testified that he had no recollection of any discussion with his defense counsel concerning his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11052 - 2005-03-31
, Applebee testified that he had no recollection of any discussion with his defense counsel concerning his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11052 - 2005-03-31