Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25981 - 25990 of 74688 for public records.
Search results 25981 - 25990 of 74688 for public records.
[PDF]
Rule petition 17-09 interested person communication from Julie Rich
) Schedule the rule petition for public hearing. (d) Refer the rule petition to another entity for its
/supreme/docs/1709intpers.pdf - 2017-12-06
) Schedule the rule petition for public hearing. (d) Refer the rule petition to another entity for its
/supreme/docs/1709intpers.pdf - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rules petition 11-06 Interested parties communication
conference that no public hearing was needed for this petition. The court has tentatively scheduled
/supreme/docs/1106publicletter.pdf - 2011-10-18
conference that no public hearing was needed for this petition. The court has tentatively scheduled
/supreme/docs/1106publicletter.pdf - 2011-10-18
[PDF]
Interested person communication on Supreme Court rule 17-02
without a public hearing. (d) Schedule the rule petition for public hearing. (e) Refer the rule
/supreme/docs/1702intpers.pdf - 2017-04-21
without a public hearing. (d) Schedule the rule petition for public hearing. (e) Refer the rule
/supreme/docs/1702intpers.pdf - 2017-04-21
[PDF]
Supreme Court rules petition 11-08 - letter to petitioner
@wicourts.gov. The court may request further information prior to a public hearing or open administrative
/supreme/docs/1108petitionerletter.pdf - 2012-01-05
@wicourts.gov. The court may request further information prior to a public hearing or open administrative
/supreme/docs/1108petitionerletter.pdf - 2012-01-05
[PDF]
WI 43
, 2007, the supreme court held a public hearing on the rule petition number 06-04. On April 12, 2007
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50522 - 2014-09-15
, 2007, the supreme court held a public hearing on the rule petition number 06-04. On April 12, 2007
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50522 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 43
, 2007, the supreme court held a public hearing on the rule petition number 06-04. On April 12, 2007
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50522 - 2014-09-15
, 2007, the supreme court held a public hearing on the rule petition number 06-04. On April 12, 2007
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50522 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Struebing
for a state public defender, the court could appoint him an attorney if he could have demonstrated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5497 - 2017-09-19
for a state public defender, the court could appoint him an attorney if he could have demonstrated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5497 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to consider whether a six-month jail sentence was necessary to protect the public. We affirm. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53364 - 2010-08-16
to consider whether a six-month jail sentence was necessary to protect the public. We affirm. ΒΆ2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53364 - 2010-08-16
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew L. Hunsick
count of misconduct in public office. The parties stipulated that the appropriate discipline to impose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
count of misconduct in public office. The parties stipulated that the appropriate discipline to impose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. An officer exercises a community caretaker function when he or she discovers a member of the public who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73219 - 2011-11-08
. An officer exercises a community caretaker function when he or she discovers a member of the public who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73219 - 2011-11-08