Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25991 - 26000 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 25991 - 26000 of 65143 for or b.
[PDF]
State v. Randy O. Bohardt
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), STATS., Bohardt was sentenced to two years on each count, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10111 - 2017-09-19
, contrary to § 946.49(1)(b), STATS., Bohardt was sentenced to two years on each count, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10111 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on this ground. B. Evidence of Other Sexual Encounters ¶10 Defense counsel had originally attempted to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
on this ground. B. Evidence of Other Sexual Encounters ¶10 Defense counsel had originally attempted to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The holding in Smith was fact specific, as is every prejudice determination. There, we explained, “[B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
. The holding in Smith was fact specific, as is every prejudice determination. There, we explained, “[B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120636 - 2014-09-15
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Andrea M.S.
this condition within twelve months. B. Newly Discovered Evidence ¶13 Andrea and David argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7647 - 2005-03-31
this condition within twelve months. B. Newly Discovered Evidence ¶13 Andrea and David argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7647 - 2005-03-31
State v. Belinda C. Wolf
through the procedural requirements or to point them to the proper substantive law.”[5] Id. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16197 - 2005-03-31
through the procedural requirements or to point them to the proper substantive law.”[5] Id. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16197 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard V. Lauth
drive off after being approached by an officer. “[B]ehavior which evinces in the mind of a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11802 - 2005-03-31
drive off after being approached by an officer. “[B]ehavior which evinces in the mind of a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11802 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Herbert L. Usow
notice of his receipt of funds belonging to her, he violated SCR 20:1.15(b).[3] The referee concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17183 - 2005-03-31
notice of his receipt of funds belonging to her, he violated SCR 20:1.15(b).[3] The referee concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17183 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, the establishment of which are required for a Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment. Wis. Stat. § 980.02(2)(b), (c). See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89022 - 2012-11-06
, the establishment of which are required for a Wis. Stat. ch. 980 commitment. Wis. Stat. § 980.02(2)(b), (c). See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89022 - 2012-11-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and the order denying his postconviction motion. See WIS. STAT. § 948.025(1)(b) (2023-24).1 We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944343 - 2025-04-23
and the order denying his postconviction motion. See WIS. STAT. § 948.025(1)(b) (2023-24).1 We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944343 - 2025-04-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and tenant exists between the parties; (b) whether the tenant is holding over; (c) whether proper notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833101 - 2024-08-01
and tenant exists between the parties; (b) whether the tenant is holding over; (c) whether proper notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833101 - 2024-08-01