Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25991 - 26000 of 43166 for t o.
Search results 25991 - 26000 of 43166 for t o.
COURT OF APPEALS
resentencing “[t]here must be some connection between the factor and the sentencing—something which strikes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-05-19
resentencing “[t]here must be some connection between the factor and the sentencing—something which strikes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49234 - 2010-05-19
State v. Richard W. Foelker
” as follows: [T]he period of time from one-half hour after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13361 - 2005-03-31
” as follows: [T]he period of time from one-half hour after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise and all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13361 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522581 - 2022-05-17
(3). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this summary disposition order will not be published. Sheila T
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522581 - 2022-05-17
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2012AP584 Cir. Ct. No. 2011CV4669
the exercise of the elective franchise is subject to at least five tests,” including that it not violate “[t
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80197 - 2014-09-15
the exercise of the elective franchise is subject to at least five tests,” including that it not violate “[t
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80197 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15
order will not be published. Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15
[PDF]
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
. Wilcox would affirm; Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, Justice N. Patrick Crooks, and Justice David T. Prosser
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17165 - 2017-09-21
. Wilcox would affirm; Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, Justice N. Patrick Crooks, and Justice David T. Prosser
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17165 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Adam C.
definitive ruling … [and t]he reasons for counsel’s withdrawal of the inquiry are not expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13438 - 2017-09-21
definitive ruling … [and t]he reasons for counsel’s withdrawal of the inquiry are not expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13438 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gerald J. Clark
to the seriousness of both this crime and his prior record, “[t]he weight to be given each factor is within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15945 - 2017-09-21
to the seriousness of both this crime and his prior record, “[t]he weight to be given each factor is within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15945 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To establish prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872713 - 2024-11-07
of reasonableness.” Id. at 688. To establish prejudice, “[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872713 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that “there was contact.” Blank argued that the video recording shows that “[a]t no point does [Blank] have any sort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073346 - 2026-02-05
that “there was contact.” Blank argued that the video recording shows that “[a]t no point does [Blank] have any sort
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1073346 - 2026-02-05