Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 261 - 270 of 68274 for did.
Search results 261 - 270 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Eickner did not establish a fair and just reason in support of his motion to withdraw his no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417443 - 2021-09-01
that Eickner did not establish a fair and just reason in support of his motion to withdraw his no contest
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417443 - 2021-09-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel. We also conclude that the court’s response to the jury did not constitute plain error. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74288 - 2014-09-15
of counsel. We also conclude that the court’s response to the jury did not constitute plain error. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74288 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
response to the jury did not constitute plain error. We affirm. Background ¶2 In September 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74288 - 2011-11-22
response to the jury did not constitute plain error. We affirm. Background ¶2 In September 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74288 - 2011-11-22
[PDF]
State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
Kuechenmeister read the Informing the Accused. Kroeplin never indicated that he did not understand the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
Kuechenmeister read the Informing the Accused. Kroeplin never indicated that he did not understand the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6729 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) the pleadings were untimely and (2) they did not state a basis for relief available to Czysz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221851 - 2018-10-17
) the pleadings were untimely and (2) they did not state a basis for relief available to Czysz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221851 - 2018-10-17
State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
that he did not understand the form. Kroeplin consented to the blood test. ¶4 Kroeplin testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2012-06-07
that he did not understand the form. Kroeplin consented to the blood test. ¶4 Kroeplin testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2012-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Thomas L. Blonigen
for postconviction relief. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19788 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. He argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19788 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Karich
, the letter asserted that the plea colloquy did not comply with the requirements of § 971.08, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10870 - 2017-09-20
, the letter asserted that the plea colloquy did not comply with the requirements of § 971.08, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10870 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the circuit court did not have the equitable power to award attorney fees to Van Zeeland; that even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30898 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court did not have the equitable power to award attorney fees to Van Zeeland; that even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30898 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas L. Blonigen
ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that he did not knowingly waive his right to testify. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19788 - 2005-10-04
ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and that he did not knowingly waive his right to testify. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19788 - 2005-10-04