Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 261 - 270 of 15393 for probate.
Search results 261 - 270 of 15393 for probate.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a rule of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32619 - 2014-09-15
a rule of probation (Rule 21) imposed on Robert B. Ciarpaglini in April 2004 by the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32619 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Michael Popple appeals an order denying his motion to modify the conditions of his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102757 - 2013-10-03
and Kloppenburg, JJ. Michael Popple appeals an order denying his motion to modify the conditions of his probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102757 - 2013-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
probation. Popple argues the circuit court erred by failing to either: (1) direct the sheriff of the Iowa
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102757 - 2017-09-21
probation. Popple argues the circuit court erred by failing to either: (1) direct the sheriff of the Iowa
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102757 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
) did not have reasonable grounds to place him on a probation hold; and finally, it was violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
) did not have reasonable grounds to place him on a probation hold; and finally, it was violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
the Department of Corrections (DOC) did not have reasonable grounds to place him on a probation hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19
the Department of Corrections (DOC) did not have reasonable grounds to place him on a probation hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5585 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Carl Kaminski v. David H. Schwarz
the revocation of Carl Kaminski's probation. The revocation was based on Kaminski's violation of two rules
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17568 - 2017-09-21
the revocation of Carl Kaminski's probation. The revocation was based on Kaminski's violation of two rules
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17568 - 2017-09-21
State v. Scott R. Weber
, contrary to § 947.01, Stats., and from an order sentencing him to probation. The conviction resulted from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 947.01, Stats., and from an order sentencing him to probation. The conviction resulted from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
competence to impose a sentence after No. 2006AP26-CR 2 revocation of his probation because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26448 - 2017-09-21
competence to impose a sentence after No. 2006AP26-CR 2 revocation of his probation because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26448 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kenneth Pringle, Jr.
revocation of his probation because he was not yet on probation at the time he was revoked. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
revocation of his probation because he was not yet on probation at the time he was revoked. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26448 - 2006-09-11
State v. J.T. Jones-Johnson
probation and that the victim’s postconviction testimony that she did not want Jones-Johnson to go to prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14601 - 2005-03-31
probation and that the victim’s postconviction testimony that she did not want Jones-Johnson to go to prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14601 - 2005-03-31