Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 261 - 270 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 261 - 270 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was denied his right to a speedy trial. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. ¶2 Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28278 - 2014-09-15
was denied his right to a speedy trial. We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. ¶2 Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28278 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied his right to a speedy trial; the circuit court erred when it allowed the State to present other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843804 - 2024-09-04
was denied his right to a speedy trial; the circuit court erred when it allowed the State to present other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843804 - 2024-09-04
[PDF]
State v. David Lee Miller
$500, and his did not. He was not placed on cash bail. SPEEDY TRIAL ¶3 Two years and five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25540 - 2017-09-21
$500, and his did not. He was not placed on cash bail. SPEEDY TRIAL ¶3 Two years and five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25540 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Lee Miller
trial. Miller claims the delay violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We disagree. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
trial. Miller claims the delay violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We disagree. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 23, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
. The trial court denied the motion and, at the same hearing, defense counsel entered a speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
. The trial court denied the motion and, at the same hearing, defense counsel entered a speedy trial demand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99700 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and, at the same hearing, defense counsel entered a speedy trial demand. Because defense counsel could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99700 - 2014-09-15
and, at the same hearing, defense counsel entered a speedy trial demand. Because defense counsel could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99700 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to argue that (1) his right to a speedy trial under Wis. Stat. § 971.11 was violated, and (2) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30222 - 2007-09-10
to argue that (1) his right to a speedy trial under Wis. Stat. § 971.11 was violated, and (2) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30222 - 2007-09-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that (1) his right to a speedy trial under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30222 - 2014-09-15
counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that (1) his right to a speedy trial under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30222 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction, his statutory speedy trial right was violated, there was insufficient evidence on the harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34993 - 2008-12-22
jurisdiction, his statutory speedy trial right was violated, there was insufficient evidence on the harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34993 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
personal jurisdiction, No. 2008AP1512-CR 2 his statutory speedy trial right was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34993 - 2014-09-15
personal jurisdiction, No. 2008AP1512-CR 2 his statutory speedy trial right was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34993 - 2014-09-15