Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 261 - 270 of 96371 for state case.
Search results 261 - 270 of 96371 for state case.
State v. Antwon C.
the case. J.R. v. State, 152 Wis.2d 598, 603–604, 449 N.W.2d 52, 54 (Ct. App. 1989). Continuances, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12015 - 2005-03-31
the case. J.R. v. State, 152 Wis.2d 598, 603–604, 449 N.W.2d 52, 54 (Ct. App. 1989). Continuances, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12015 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Kalk
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15469 - 2005-03-31
Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed State of Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15469 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Thompson
sentencing recommendations; (7) he should be resentenced because the State breached the plea bargain in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3411 - 2005-03-31
sentencing recommendations; (7) he should be resentenced because the State breached the plea bargain in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3411 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Thompson
sentencing recommendations; (7) he should be resentenced because the State breached the plea bargain in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3410 - 2005-03-31
sentencing recommendations; (7) he should be resentenced because the State breached the plea bargain in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3410 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gabriel R.M.
Reports. No. 95-3527 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
Reports. No. 95-3527 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David Kalk
-CR Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15469 - 2017-09-21
-CR Complete Title of Case: †Petition for Review Filed STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15469 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Garel
was imposed. And the State further argues that, in any case, Garel could not have suffered any detriment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13391 - 2005-03-31
was imposed. And the State further argues that, in any case, Garel could not have suffered any detriment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13391 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Franklin
cases where either we or the United States Supreme Court have concluded that prejudice should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21
cases where either we or the United States Supreme Court have concluded that prejudice should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21
State v. Debra Noble
was not an appropriate sanction in this case. Id. at ¶34 (Roggensack, J., dissenting). In short, she stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17583 - 2005-03-31
was not an appropriate sanction in this case. Id. at ¶34 (Roggensack, J., dissenting). In short, she stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Debra Noble
was not an appropriate sanction in this case. Id. at ¶34 (Roggensack, J., dissenting). In short, she stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17583 - 2017-09-21
was not an appropriate sanction in this case. Id. at ¶34 (Roggensack, J., dissenting). In short, she stated
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17583 - 2017-09-21