Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 6332 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Biaya Borongan Tenaga Bangun Plafon Gypsum Plus Bahan Jetis Yogyakarta.

Tony Limbach and Tracy Limbach v. John Donath
should be reduced to the balance due on the $139,000 contract plus extras they authorized, less credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12834 - 2005-03-31

Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
found for Loehrke, but ordered Praxmarer to pay only $500 plus statutory costs and fees. That amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25624 - 2006-06-21

Kenneth L. Grover v.
to which he was not entitled, plus statutory interest on that amount. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16983 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Ultimately, a judgment was rendered for $450,000, plus costs and interest. Both parties now appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94205 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
ordinance. In LNC’s view, KT’s bid of $700,000, plus $250,000 for landscaping, is not “adequate fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6656 - 2017-09-20

Michael R. Wolfe v. Nathen Saloch
of the security deposit, plus costs and attorney's fees pursuant to § 100.20(5), Stats. The Salochs filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9719 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court found that Bielinski had monthly expenses of about $5,240 plus monthly debt payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30425 - 2007-10-01

State v. Lenny Keding
, Keding was sentenced to an additional two years, which sentence was stayed, plus seven years probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11617 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roger L. Kaufman
-3110-CR 2 court sentenced him to life imprisonment plus five years for the homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11632 - 2017-09-19

City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
of Milwaukee $5000 plus costs as recovery for the cost of razing his property. Reischel argues that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2005-03-31