Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 4343 for bd.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 4343 for bd.
[PDF]
Jane Hemberger v. Jo Ann Bitzer
. 1985); Jordi v. Sauk Prairie School Bd., 651 F. Supp. 1566, 1573 (W.D. Wis. 1987); Thompson v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21
. 1985); Jordi v. Sauk Prairie School Bd., 651 F. Supp. 1566, 1573 (W.D. Wis. 1987); Thompson v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no practical legal effect upon the existing controversy.” State ex rel. Badke v. Village Bd. of Greendale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=642776 - 2023-04-12
no practical legal effect upon the existing controversy.” State ex rel. Badke v. Village Bd. of Greendale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=642776 - 2023-04-12
[PDF]
State v. Bonnie L.K.
or mandatory, "the prime object is to ascertain the legislative intent." Wagner v. State Medical Exam. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10900 - 2017-09-20
or mandatory, "the prime object is to ascertain the legislative intent." Wagner v. State Medical Exam. Bd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10900 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
by substantial evidence. Krahenbuhl v. Wisconsin Dentistry Examining Bd., 2006 WI App 73, ¶18, 292 Wis. 2d 154
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
by substantial evidence. Krahenbuhl v. Wisconsin Dentistry Examining Bd., 2006 WI App 73, ¶18, 292 Wis. 2d 154
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Funds Bd., 203 Wis. 2d 363, 368-69, 553 N.W.2d 830 (Ct. App. 1996). A single violation of a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250322 - 2019-11-19
Funds Bd., 203 Wis. 2d 363, 368-69, 553 N.W.2d 830 (Ct. App. 1996). A single violation of a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250322 - 2019-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The second type is a regulatory taking. See Eberle v. Dane Cty. Bd. of Adjustment, 227 Wis. 2d 609, 622
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230949 - 2018-12-26
). The second type is a regulatory taking. See Eberle v. Dane Cty. Bd. of Adjustment, 227 Wis. 2d 609, 622
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230949 - 2018-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
invalid permitting process. See City of Waukesha v. Town Bd., 198 Wis. 2d 592, 607, 543 N.W.2d 515 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208095 - 2018-02-07
invalid permitting process. See City of Waukesha v. Town Bd., 198 Wis. 2d 592, 607, 543 N.W.2d 515 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208095 - 2018-02-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, the common and approved usage of the word or phrase applies. Propp v. Sauk Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131025 - 2014-12-01
, the common and approved usage of the word or phrase applies. Propp v. Sauk Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2010 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131025 - 2014-12-01
Robert D. Pflughoeft v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of facts presents a legal question that we review de novo. See Bufkin v. Milwaukee Bd. of School Directors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2237 - 2005-03-31
of facts presents a legal question that we review de novo. See Bufkin v. Milwaukee Bd. of School Directors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2237 - 2005-03-31
Margaret Hoffman v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
that the legislature meant what it said when it used the word “file.” Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis. 2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4640 - 2013-10-21
that the legislature meant what it said when it used the word “file.” Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis. 2d 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4640 - 2013-10-21