Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 29713 for des.
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
to $139.17 a month and the maintenance obligation to $500 a month. Carpenter moved for a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14891 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 3
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.2 Paskiewicz v. American Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 WI App 92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597871 - 2023-02-14
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo.2 Paskiewicz v. American Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 2013 WI App 92
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=597871 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Joseph P. LaPere v. June Gengler
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Heinritz v. Lawrence Univ., 194 Wis.2d 606, 610, 535 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15356 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Heinritz v. Lawrence Univ., 194 Wis.2d 606, 610, 535 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15356 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
facts presents a question of law, which we generally review de novo. Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29242 - 2007-05-30
facts presents a question of law, which we generally review de novo. Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29242 - 2007-05-30
COURT OF APPEALS
the right to be free from double jeopardy,” which are questions of law we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
the right to be free from double jeopardy,” which are questions of law we review de novo. Id., ¶13. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141601 - 2015-05-12
Walgreen Co. v. Wisconsin Pharmacy Examining Board
guidance,” we will owe no deference to the agency’s interpretation; we will review it de novo, giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12526 - 2005-03-31
guidance,” we will owe no deference to the agency’s interpretation; we will review it de novo, giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12526 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 102
court. We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36717 - 2014-09-15
court. We review a circuit court’s order granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard of review should apply to this case. Freer argues we should apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36411 - 2014-09-15
standard of review should apply to this case. Freer argues we should apply a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36411 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
should not have been counted as a marital asset. He acknowledges that the value of the television is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30794 - 2007-11-06
should not have been counted as a marital asset. He acknowledges that the value of the television is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30794 - 2007-11-06