Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 17090 for probate/1000.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 17090 for probate/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with Blount’s attorney that Blount needed “some probation time.” The court imposed and stayed ninety-days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
with Blount’s attorney that Blount needed “some probation time.” The court imposed and stayed ninety-days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
Koenig on three years of probation.2 Koenig’s probation was revoked on October 12, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5183 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cheryl A. Koenig
. The trial court withheld sentencing and placed Koenig on three years of probation.[2] Koenig’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court withheld sentencing and placed Koenig on three years of probation.[2] Koenig’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges. Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13747 - 2014-09-15
to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges. Specifically, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13747 - 2014-09-15
State v. Nicholas S. Radtke
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
that statements made to a parole or probation officer are inadmissible on subsequent related charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James E. Gray
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
the conditions of his probation to include a one-year jail term. We conclude that Gray has partially waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11741 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Garrett A.B.
will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation of any of the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
will place the juvenile on intensive probation--but if there is any violation of any of the conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14068 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition. ¶5 At sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition. ¶5 At sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30467 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a Division of Hearings and Appeals No. 2019AP489 2 (DHA) decision to revoke Risch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
a Division of Hearings and Appeals No. 2019AP489 2 (DHA) decision to revoke Risch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09