Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2601 - 2610 of 63187 for records.

[PDF] NOTICE
for the sentences imposed. The circuit court denied Staten’s motion, and Staten appeals. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28688 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
, this letter is not in the record nor was it referenced in Mason’s motion for a new trial. Thus, we cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28108 - 2007-02-12

[PDF] NOTICE
court or during a telephone conference on the record, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 48.315(2).2 Wesley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30505 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28916 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] NOTICE
, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28916 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
convictions and sentence. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169582 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David Israel v. Aaron Israel
of the Sentry properties and therefore was responsible for providing the records to facilitate a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14301 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - Court services - For the public - Self-help law center
Conference Planning Committee Judicial Education Committee Records & technology Consolidated Court Automation
/services/public/selfhelp/namechange.htm - 2025-12-24

[PDF] State v. Marvin Prince
crime lab report prior to his entering the pleas. We conclude that, on this record, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12353 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marvin Prince
that, on this record, the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion when it determined that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12353 - 2005-03-31